We have a dilemma on what to choose, strange thing is that currently they confirmed to use SD Access at main offices i.e we will have borders as cn and routers in DC as TC to create VXLAN/LISP sessions over DC between multiple sites
But if they choose Palo Alto as SD Wan will it be possible to add Cisco SD access switches on branches to fabric?
Im not sure if possible with Cisco SD Wan, but logically Cisco should have such mechanism
NE team want to keep Cisco SD WAN solution, but need to explain what are the real advantages vs Palo Alto, Palo Alto prices must be lower, but will it be reliable for large enterprise?
Palo Alto SD wan can be brought up on existing FW as a plugin and ION devices as a branches routers, but I never hear if anyone using it in large companies
Just wanted to know your insights or opinions, what are the real advantages of Cisco SD Wan solution vs Palo Alto considering that we are going to use Cisco DNAC+ISE and Palo Alto as a corporate FW
